Kia took the top spot in J.D. Power’s annual report card on vehicle quality for a second consecutive year, as industry ratings reached a new record and domestic brands maintained their edge over foreign rivals.
Kia, with 72 problems reported per 100 vehicles, was able to retain its No. 1 position despite a shake-up in the 2017 U.S. Initial Quality Study rankings that included significant shifts with the German and Japanese brands — most notably, Toyota and Lexus — falling behind many U.S. and Korean brands.
“This is without question the best quality the world has ever seen,” Dave Sargent, vice president, global automotive at J.D. Power, said when releasing the results at an Automotive Press Association meeting in Detroit. “The industry is picking up steam and really improving the quality of their vehicles.”
In its first year as a standalone brand, Hyundai’s luxury Genesis brand debuting at No. 2, with 77 problems reported per 100 vehicles. Porsche, with 78 problems, dropped to third — its lowest ranking since 2015.
Ford and Ram, both with 86, rounded out the top five brand positions — marking the highest positions in the study for both brands and the first time since 2011 that two Detroit brands have ranked that high.
Sargent said Ford’s improvement, up from 11th in 2016, was largely because of its new Sync 3 infotainment system, a replacement for its previous Sync and MyFord Touch system that plagued the brand’s rankings in recent years.
J.D. Power 2017 U.S. Initial Quality Study
|Nameplate IQS ranking||Problems per 100 vehicles|
Improvements to infotainment systems greatly helped brands from the Detroit automakers outperform import brands for the second year in a row, according to Sargent. In 2017, domestic brands received a score of 93 compared with 99 for import brands. It’s just the third time since the study was first published in 1987 that domestic brands outperformed their foreign counterparts.
“The domestics have done a pretty good job of wrestling the infotainment issue,” Sargent said. “They have a significant advantage of the imports.”
Toyota’s brands, which for years led or were ranked near the top of the study, had mediocre performances this year, with Lexus ranking one position below the industry average and Toyota ranking one above it. This was the first time in the history of the survey that Lexus scored below average.
Nissan, with a score of 93, was the top-ranked Japanese brand at No. 10 — level in the rankings from a year ago.
At the very bottom of this year’s rankings were Mazda, Land Rover, Mitsubishi, Volvo, Jaguar and Fiat — all with between 125 and 163 problems reported per 100 vehicles.
Many of the low rankings, according to Sargent, are due to the brands launching all-new products, which tend to have more quality issues than older, more refined models.
New-vehicle quality overall for the industry reached a new record, improving a significant 8 percent from last year’s previous record-setting year. The industry average for the 2017 study is 97 problems reported per 100 vehicles, down from 105 a year ago.
“For the most part, the industry as a whole has got their arms around this,” Sargent said. “This is the third-straight year of improvement. It’s an accelerating rate of improvement.”
The only category to worsen this year was features, controls and displays. The largest increases in problems were for cruise control (primarily adaptive cruise); lane-departure warning; collision-avoidance/alert systems; and blind-spot warning.
The study was based on nearly 80,000 responses from owners and lessees of 2017 model-year vehicles after 90 days of ownership. Consumers were surveyed from February through May.
Hyundai Motor Co., which includes Kia, was awarded the most model-level awards. They included the Kia Cadenza; Kia Forte; Kia Niro; Kia Sorento; and Kia Soul.
Following the South Korean’s five awards were General Motors Co. (Chevrolet Silverado; Chevrolet Silverado HD; Chevrolet Sonic; and GMC Terrain) and BMW Group (BMW 2 Series; BMW 4 Series; BMW X6; and MINI Cooper) both with four awards.
Top three models per segment
|Segment||Highest ranked||Others ranked|
|Small Car||Chevrolet Sonic||Toyota Yaris, Honda Fit|
|Small Premium Car||BMW 2 Series||BMW i3, Lexus CT|
|Compact Car||Kia Forte||Chevrolet Cruze (tie), Toyota Corolla (tie), Volkswagen Jetta (tie)|
|Compact Sporty Car*||Mini Cooper|
|Compact MPV*||Kia Soul|
|Compact Premium Car||BMW 4 Series||Lexus ES, Cadillac ATS|
|Midsize Car||Toyota Camry||Kia Optima, Nissan Altima|
|Midsize Sporty Car*||Ford Mustang||Dodge Challenger|
|Minivan*||Chrysler Pacifica||Dodge Grand Caravan|
|Midsize Premium Car||Lexus GS||Lincoln Continental, Audi A7|
|Midsize Premium Sporty Car*||Porsche 911|
|Large Car||Kia Cadenza||Toyota Avalon, Nissan Maxima|
|Small SUV||Kia Niro||Kia Sportage, Buick Encore (tie), Volkswagen Tiguan (tie)|
|Small Premium SUV*||Mercedes-Benz GLA||BMW X1|
|Compact SUV||GMC Terrain||Ford Escape, Chevrolet Equinox|
|Compact Premium SUV||Porsche Macan||BMW X3, BMW X4|
|Midsize SUV||Kia Sorento||Toyota Highlander, Buick Enclave|
|Midsize Premium SUV||BMW X6||BMW X5, Porsche Cayanne|
|Midsize Pickup||Nissan Frontier||Chevrolet Colorado, Honda Ridgeline|
|Large SUV||Ford Expedition||Chevrolet Tahoe, Toyota Sequoia|
|Large Premium SUV||Infiniti QX80||Lincoln Navigator, Mercedes-Benz GLS|
|Large Light Duty Pickup||Chevrolet Silverado||Ram 1500, Toyota Tundra|
|Large Heavy Duty Pickup*||Chevrolet Silverado HD||Ford Super Duty|
|*No other model in this segment performs above segment average.|
|There must be at least three models with 80% of market sales in any given award segment for an award to be presented. The Large Premium Car segment did not meet criteria to be award eligible, thus no awards will be issued.|
Fuente: Automotive News